RELATION TO THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS
Matthew, Mark and
Luke’s Gospels are called the Synoptic Gospels (they offer a common view and
approach to the life of Christ). John’s
is a clearly different type of presentation.
·
Much is missing in John that is found in the Synoptics
(virgin birth, temptation of Christ, baptism, the transfiguration, cure of any
demoniacs or lepers, parables, Lord’s Supper, agony in Gethsemane, the
ascension).
·
John has material not found in the others
(marriage at Cana, Nicodemus, woman at the well, raising of Lazarus, washing
the feet of the disciples, the Upper Room Discourse).
·
John’s presentation is different (less narrative,
more discourse; more philosophical and theological; more King, less kingdom).
All these
differences can be explained by the differences in purpose between the
Synoptics and John. John does not intend
to be as comprehensive as the others. It
is, rather, a supplement. By the
time John wrote, the others had a wide hearing.
What was needed was a presentation of Christ’s life that met a
particular need.
There are a few
chronological differences that some suggest are contradictions between the Synoptics
and John. Here are three with suggested
answers.
1.
John presents Christ cleansing the temple at the
beginning of His ministry, the Synoptics at the end. Answer: there were two cleansings. Those thrown out the first time were
certainly back the next day. Christ set
the tone of confrontation with the religious establishment early, then was
consistent with that last week in His jealousy for His Father’s glory.
2.
The Synoptics speak of only one Passover, thus one year
of ministry, while John speaks of three or four and at least three years of
ministry. Answer: The time indicators in
the Synoptics are vague. There are
clearly gaps, because they have almost no concern for Jesus’ ministry in Judea
and Jerusalem until the final week. On
the other hand, John has almost no concern for what went on in Galilee, and
spends his energy mostly on the Judean ministry, thus speaking of the different
Passovers, which help pin down the length of Christ’s ministry.
3.
John dates the last supper before Passover (13:1) while
the Synoptics date it the same day as Passover (Mk. 14:12). Answer:
Recently there has come to light the existence of a second calendar,
from the religious community at Qumran. If the Synoptics used this and John the
Jerusalem calendar, this would allow for differences. Another possible answer is the difference
between the Sadducean custom of offering the sacrifice after the Sabbath following
Passover, while the Pharisees offered the sacrifice the day after the Passover.
Overall, I see John as supplementary to and
interpretive of the Synoptics, and neither independent of nor a substitute for
the Synoptics.
No comments:
Post a Comment