As we write this, President Trump has just
declared a couple of days ago the recognition of our government for Jerusalem
as the capital of Israel and the intention to move our embassy there in the
coming years. We are not sure how this
will all play out, of course, but we consider this the right things to do, not
because we dislike for Palestinians or are not concerned for their plight, but
because we believe it right to be a blessing to Israel.
Our reason for this is that we believe that
today the Abrahamic Covenant is still in effect, even though the people of
Israel are not the saved nation that will enter the Kingdom of Christ. Some question this interpretation. There are those, of course, who believe the
literal nation of Israel has no future in God’s plan and that all her blessings
have gone to the Church. We will not say
anything of that, hoping that you understand that God is faithful and would not
renege on His promise. But others
maintain that as long as Israel is in partial
blindness (Rom. 11:25) all has been set aside.
They may say that someday the Abrahamic blessings will come to Israel
but not now.
There are many ways to answer this. My purpose in this post is to note something
in Daniel 10-12. Today’s reading gives
you the context of this amazingly detailed prophecy. It is about Israel in the latter days, and it
begins with the days of Daniel which are referred to as the times of the Gentiles.
Those times continue to this
day and will only end with the Revelation of Jesus Christ.
It
is the times of the Gentiles, not because the nation is in or out of the land. At the time of Daniel the nation was in exile
but soon would reestablish a presence in the land under Medo-Persian
authority. There would be no Davidic
king, even as today the people are in the land but there is no Davidic
king. So we simply ask you to know how
God speaks of Israel at this time of Gentile control.
·
11:16: it is the glorious land.
·
11:20: the glorious
kingdom will be taxed by Gentiles.
·
11:22: the head of the government is the prince of the covenant, one who was
not a king. What covenant does this
refer to but the Davidic covenant? That
is the only covenant that deals with royalty.
·
11:28,30: the Gentiles move against the holy covenant with rage, favoring
those who forsake that covenant. What
covenant is this but the Abrahamic? That
is the covenant that involved the land and God’s favor on Israel.
What is our point? In the times when the Gentiles rule, a time
of God’s judgment on Israel for their sin, God still speaks in terms of the promise.
Today we must say the same: it is the glorious land, they are the people
of the covenant. It makes sense to me:
those who bless Israel will be blessed; those who curse Israel will be
cursed. This does not say anything about
the spiritual condition of Israel (it is generally very secular and corrupt by
my estimation); not does it say anything about the spiritual condition of our
president (think what you want; God is the only One who knows). We should stand with Israel remembering as
Christians that the Jews are beloved for the sake of election and enemies for
the sake of the gospel (Rom. 11:28).
No comments:
Post a Comment