Rom. 8:1-11, Circumcision Made Without Hands (2)

Paul spoke of trying to live his life “under the law.”  “With my mind,” he says, I “serve the law of God.”  But when the law came it aroused the sinful passions of the flesh.  So Paul was defeated.  “I don’t do what, in my mind, I want to do; yet I do the things that in my mind I don’t want to do.”  The problem he said was, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me (7:20).  The problem is that rule #1 (come on Paul, do evil) is strengthened or aroused by the law that Paul longs to obey.

What is the answer? The law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has made me free from the law of sin and death (8:2).  There is another law that comes into the one who is “in Christ Jesus,” who has learned to walk according to the Spirit rather than the flesh (8:1).  This law is the life of Christ.  I am crucified with Christ, nevertheless I live, yet not I but Christ lives in me (Gal. 2:20a).  In Rom. 8:9a Paul says it like this: But you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you.  Christ lives in the believer by His Holy Spirit who indwelt the one who has put his faith in Christ.  We know this has happened because, if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ he is not His (8:9b).  The Holy Spirit, when we are born again, makes us alive in Christ.  If the Spirit of Him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, He who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through His Spirit who dwells in you (8:11). This is the “eternal life” promised in the gospel (John 3:16).  This is what it means to be a “new creation” (2 Cor. 5:17).

But still, what does this rule #4 do?  First, it does what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh (8:3a).  Second, it condemns sin in the flesh (8:3b). That is, it takes away the power of the first law.  But again, what is the power of the first law?  It is the second law, the law of God.  What Christ did was remove the law of God by fulfilling it, by fully satisfying the righteous demands of God’s law.  Remember that Jesus promised this: I did not come to destroy but to fulfill … one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled (Matt. 5:17-18).  This fulfillment came to an end with His death on the cross.  When He said, “It is finished,” He had fulfilled the law. 

The way Paul said this in Colossians was this: having wiped out the hand-writing of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us.  And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross (2:14).  The “hand-writing of ordinances” is not a list of your sins; it is the righteous requirements of the law!  And that, my brothers and sisters, is the circumcision made without hands.  And now you can understand why, after Moses told Israel the LORD has not yet given you a heart to perceive and eyes to see and ears to hear, to this very day (Dt. 29:4) that He then promised that the day would come when the LORD your God will circumcise your heart, and the heart of your descendants, to love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul, that you may live (Dt. 30:6).

Rom. 7:13-24, Circumcision Made Without Hands (1)

What Colossians says in 5 verses (2:11-15) Romans says in 3 chapters (6-8).  Spiritual “baptism” is explained in Rom. 6:1-14.  Circumcision made without hands is in Rom. 6:15-8:17. That term is not used in Romans. However both Col. 2:11 (“putting off the body of the sins of the flesh”) and Romans (7:24, “this body of death;” 8:10: “the body is dead because of sin;” 8:13: “put to death the deeds of the body”) speak of the same problem.  How are we to live our lives as Christians, given we still exist in the body we have used for sin all our lives?  The body is dead spiritually.  Yet, it is still our bodily home on this earth.  This is the problem.  Let’s study this out, beginning by identifying “four laws” in Romans 7:21-8:4.

·       In 7:21 Paul saw a law “that evil is present with me.”  The previous verses, where he describes the struggle (“I want to do good but I do evil”) is what he is talking about.  Sin is present, always.  That is “rule” #1 if you will.

·       In 7:23 Paul saw “another law in my members” (i.e. in his body).  That verse tells us this “rule” is about bringing Paul into captivity to sin.  Paul has a “mind” to do God’s law (7:22).  Yet there is something that is making this impossible for him.  What is that “something?”  Consider this carefully.  This “other” law is the law of God, whether the Mosaic law or the law of the conscience.  Don’t be aghast at this.  Paul makes this very clear.  For when we were in the flesh, the sinful passions which were aroused by the law were at work in our members to bear fruit to death (7:5).  In 6:14 we read, For sin shall not have dominion over you, for you are not under law but under grace.  The clear implication is that if we are “under law” we are being lorded over by sin.  This is the thing that the law “could not do” in 8:3.  In 8:7-8 we get the clear picture: the law of God is good because it points out my sin to me, enables me to know that my “covetousness” is sin.  But sin, taking opportunity by the commandment, produces all manner of evil desire.  For apart from the law sin was dead.  So “rule” #2 is: “keeping the law of God” will not produce holiness but will increase my struggles with sin.  Defeat is guaranteed!

·       In 7:23, the “law of my mind” is the third law.  In Paul’s mind he delights in the law of God (v22).  In Paul’s mind he longs to do good.  This ruled Paul’s life, even when he was living in Judaism before Christ.  So the first law says “do evil.”  The third law says “do good.”  The second law, the law of God, comes along and instead of empowering the third law it arouses the first law.  O wretched man that I am!  Who will deliver me from this body of death? (7:24).  Paul’s short answer to this wretchedness is, I thank God – through Jesus Christ our Lord (7:25a).  His conclusion to this point, however, in in 7:25b: So then, with my mind I myself serve (douleuō, as a bondslave) the law of God, but with the flesh the law of sin.

·       We will continue this in the next post, but for now let me say that the fourth law is the one mentioned in 8:2: the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus.

Col. 2:6-13, The Sufficiency of the Cross (5)

The Savior is complete.  His work is complete.  The question now is, how does/did this work come to have the effect on those who believe in Christ that they are complete?  In other words, how do we come to be “in Christ”?

Before we speak of what Christ does, we need to see that the key for those who are “complete in Him” is their faith.  In Col. 1:22-23 we see that God will present us holy, blameless and above reproach in His sight if you continue in the faith, grounded and steadfast, and are not moved away from the hope of the gospel which you heard, which was preached to every creature under heaven.  Paul has already acknowledged that these people in Colossae are believers in Christ (1:4-8).  But as he says it in 2:6-7, As you therefore have received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in Him, rooted and built up in Him and established in the faith.  Some of them were tempted to add something to the work of Christ.  Paul is saying “no!”  You need to continue, growing, becoming more and more solid in your faith in Christ.  To grow in faith is not adding something to Christ or His work; faith is not a good work but an empty hand receiving.  To grow in faith is to see that faith in the all-preeminent Christ applied to more and more of your life.  If we buy into the idea that Christ did His work and now my work must be added to it, we are no longer living by faith. 

I hope you are seeing this clearly, because it is one of the greatest, liberating truths for Christians.  The same Christ of the gospel who saved us the day we first believed, is the Christ of the gospel in which we walk day by day. 

Christ’s work IN the believer, Col. 2:11-13.

Christ’s work “in” the believer is given to us with two pictures: circumcision and baptism.  Clearly, these are spiritual works.  The circumcision is “made without hands.” The baptism is a picture of our death, burial and resurrection with Christ.  We were not on the cross, in the tomb, and raised with Christ around 30AD while we were visiting Jerusalem.  Even The Twelve could not say that and they were really there.  No, our baptism is real and spiritual. 

Just as the foreskin is cut away in physical circumcision, so in spiritual circumcision there is a putting off the body of the sins of the flesh (NKJV; I realize the NU omits “of the sins.”)  From birth our physical body carried the sinful nature.  Throughout our lives our body was used to carry out the sinful passions that come from that nature.  God called on Israel to circumcise the foreskin of your heart, and be stiff-necked no longer (Dt. 10:16).  Stephen preached to the Jews, You stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears! You always resist the Holy Spirit; as your fathers did, so do you (Ac. 7:51).  This spiritual circumcision has to do with cutting away sin.  But under the law Israel could never do this.  So God promised, the LORD your God will circumcise your heart and the heart of your descendants, to love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul, that you may live (Deut. 30:6).  In Christ this promise was fulfilled.

Psalm 99

Again we have a regal Psalm that begins The Lord reigns! 

·         He is the most exalted God because He dwells between the cherubim (v1-3), a reference to the throne room of heaven (Rev. 4) and it’s shadow on earth, the Holy of Holies in the tabernacle/temple of Israel. 

·         He alone is worthy to be exalted and worshiped (v4-5) because He is just (legal) and righteous (moral) in all His doings.  He is to be worshiped at His footstool, the place on earth where He rests His feet (i.e. the temple, His holy hill, the place He designated where He would dwell with men.

·         Moses, Aaron and Samuel called on His name; They called and He answered.  Moses and Aaron were noted for their communication with God in the wilderness, even as Samuel communicated with God at a time when few were communicating with God (1 Sam. 3:1,21).  In these great men God’s justice and righteousness was clearly seen.  He forgave them while at the same time holding them accountable for their sins.  A good illustration of this is Moses who was called of God to lead Israel and yet was not permitted to enter the Promised Land because of his sin in striking the rock.  We know God’s forgiveness in Christ; but we also know that we reap what we sow.  Thus we are called to join these saints and exalt and worship the Lord our God!

This is a great call to worship.  But it is not hard to notice what is exceptional about God in this great Hymn.  Three times there are references to the holiness of God (v3,5,9).  Three times, as in the song of the angels: holy, holy, holy (Isa. 6:3; Rev. 4:8).  His name is holy (v3).  He is holy (v5).  And most wonderfully, the Lord (Yahweh) our God (the God of Israel, yes and of the Church, the only God besides whom there is no other) is holy (v9). 

Verbal definitions are hardly adequate but it is where we start.  The Hebrew qadowsh  means to be free from defilement of crimes, idolatry and other unclean and profane things (Gesenius’ Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon).  It refers to God as abhorring every kind of impurity … as being the judge of what is right and true.  God is the Holy One of Israel (Isa. 1:4 and many other places in Isaiah).

The laws in the Old Testament concerning food (Lev. 11) provided a picture of holiness.  We are to be free of anything unclean, physically removed from it and cleansed (forgiven) when we have failed to do so.  And this is critical because there are no more important words in Scripture than these: Be ye holy for I am holy (Lev. 11:45, etc; and repeated for us in 1 Peter 1:16).

And how can we say we are to satisfy this impossible command?  This Psalm tells us.  Exalt the Lord our God, and worship at His footstool.  By and in Christ, God must be the exclusive focus of our worship.  Not simply Sunday worship; we are talking about the yearnings, desires, expectations of our lives every day.  Exalt Him!  Worship Him! 

Col. 1:13-22; 2:9-10, The Sufficiency of the Cross (4)

The sufficiency of the cross begins with the sufficiency of the Savior.  For in Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily (2:9).  This is actually the conclusion to Paul’s argument in the earlier part of the letter.  The “Son of His (the Father’s) love” (1:13) is our Savior, in whom we have redemption (1:14). 

The sufficiency and fullness of the Son of God is described in two references to the “firstborn.”  In 1:15-17 He is the firstborn over all creation.  He created all things, so all things were created through and for Him.  We know He Himself was not created because, 1) He has the right of the firstborn over all creation; and 2) He existed before all things. In Him all things consist, meaning they continue to exist and fulfill their created purpose.  There is nothing in all the universes outside His firstborn authority.

In 1:18 He is the firstborn from the dead.  Here the Scriptures are specifically speaking of “the body of Christ,” “the church.”  This is the “new creation” (2 Cor. 5:17), those who have been born again.  The Father has made His Son preeminent in all things, both the original creation and the new creation.

This preeminence is related to the fact that the Son was the image of the invisible God (1:15).  The Son is the “invisible God,” but in the working of the Godhead the Son, the Word, became flesh (Jn. 1:14).  Paul does not give the detail in the incarnation as he did in Phil. 2:5-11.  What is important in Colossians is that this One who took on a visible form nevertheless had all the fullness of the Godhead dwelling in Him (1:19; 2:9).  There can be NOTHING added to Christ!

Not only is He our Savior in whom we have redemption; He is our Savior in whom we have redemption through His blood (1:14).  From the very beginning of the sin-problem in Gen. 3 there needed to be a Man (seed of the woman) whose blood would be sufficient to redeem Adam and Eve and all their lineage.  As God shed blood to provide a covering for Adam and Eve, and as God was pleased when Abel shed the blood of a lamb for an offering (Gen. 4), so God began to prepare humanity for the coming of a Savior with all-sufficient blood, a Lamb without blemish.  Those who lived before that Lamb could put their hope in Him.  And those who lived after that Lamb could put their faith in Him.  That Lamb was Jesus (John 1:29).  It pleased the Father to reconcile all things to Himself by that Lamb who shed His blood on the cross (Col. 1:19-20). 

The result is that you, who once were alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now He has reconciled in the body of His flesh through death, to present you holy and blameless, and above reproach in His sight (1:21-22).  Thus, Paul’s conclusion in 2:9-10 is not only that Christ is all-sufficient but that you are complete in Him, who is the head of all principality and power.  The Savior is complete.  His work is complete.  Those who by faith are in Him are complete!

Colossians 2:16-23, The Sufficiency of the Cross (3)

Specifically, we are talking about the sufficiency of the cross to give a person access into the presence of God.  It has to do with the rending of the veil from top to bottom.  Paul’s letter to the Colossians, the entire letter, is about the sufficiency of our Savior and His salvation, His person and work. 

Colossians was written to churches that were contending for the gospel, that were being told that the gospel was insufficient in bringing people into such a relationship with God.  They needed something more.  Whatever the “more” was, it involved philosophy and empty conceit, according to the traditions of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ (Col. 2:7).  The specifics of what “more” was needed included standards involving food or in drink, or regarding a festival or a new moon or sabbaths (2:16).  Since Paul says these things are a shadow of things to come, but the substance is of Christ (2:17) it is possible there was some Jewish/Old Testament influence involved, although it does not appear to be the strong “Judaizing” influence experienced by the Galatian Churches. 

In addition, from 2:18-23, the “more” involved taking delight in false humility and worship of angels … regulations – “do not touch, do not taste, do not handle.”  These were according to the commandments and doctrines of men, and had an appearance of wisdom in self-imposed religion, false humility, and neglect of the body.  Since Paul does not speak of these in detail, nor does he contradict each regulation, it is possible that the problem is not that they have been led to follow the wrong “religious practices” but that they have been tempted to follow ANY religious practices. 

It is also clear that what the Colossian believers are being called to “do” is seen by Paul as “in addition to” the gospel.  In Col. 2:8 these things are “not according to Christ.”  In 2:17 the religious practices are at best “a shadow” but the substance is of Christ.  Doing these things has kept them from not holding to the Head, from whom all the body, nourished and knit together by joints and ligaments, grows with the increase that is from God (2:19).  In 2:20 he clearly states that doing these things is totally unnecessary if you died with Christ from the basic principles of the world.  And at the end (2:23) he is emphatic that these religious practices are of no value against the indulgence of the flesh.  In other words, these religious practices, being designed to teach discipline or self-control, which is evident in all the rules and restrictions and taboos, are useless to do the very thing they are intended to do.

What is described here is not unusual.  It sounds like, essentially, every religion ever created.  Paul rightfully relates this to “traditions of men” and “basic principles of the world.”  The New Testament never taught these things.  We were not left with a system of religion, not even in the physical observances of water baptism and the Lord’s Table (nor foot washing if that is one of your practices).  There is a reason for that, and we will see it in Colossians.

Esther 4:10-5:3, The Sufficiency of the Cross (2)

In the previous post, the ideas about “forsaken” and “torn in two” bring me to the subject of “The Sufficiency of the Cross.”  Jesus without exception bore the sins of the world on Himself.  His work was complete.  The IMMEDIATE result was that, upon His actual death, the veil was torn, granting access to God.  In the Septuagint in Esther 1:14 we see that the seven princes of Media and Persia, the highest ranking officials in the government, were the only ones to have “access” to the king.  Later in the story, although the term is not used, the thing that everyone needed was access.  Haman had it by virtue of the King’s ring.  Esther was afraid to approach the King but did and was granted it when the King extended his scepter.  Mordecai later was given the ring, giving him access.  All this tells us that “access” is a high privilege, and brings great blessing to those who have it.

In the NT the term is used thrice.

Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom also we have access by faith into this grace in which we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God. (Rom. 5:1-2)

For through Him we both (Jewish and Gentile believers in Christ) have access by one Spirit to the Father. (Eph. 2:18)

…according to the eternal purpose which He accomplished in Christ Jesus our Lord, in whom we have boldness and access with confidence through faith in Him. (Eph. 3:11-12)

Before we go any further, I want to share some current background illustrations that have brought this “access” to my attention.  We recently made a four week to visit family and friends.  We attended church fellowship on the four Sundays in what would be called “evangelical” churches.  In two of the four we were encouraged to celebrate or participate in some way in the 40-days of Lent.  I sat wondering why Protestants are taking up the call to Lent?  For some reason, centuries ago, we found these to be lacking in some way.  People died over the issue.  It appeared to my keen “pastor’s” eye that one church was parroting a program suggested by someone else.  Sure enough, later, through an internet search, I could find the same materials and terms and PowerPoint slides that had been used.  The other, which I know has some Anglican leanings, was much more “original” about it. 

Additionally, I have seen some article suggesting there is a great movement among young people towards the Catholic Church, even from those with Protestant leanings.  The reason has to do with a love for “ancient religion” and the ritualistic emphasis of the RCC.  Again, I’m wondering why?  Don’t expect a full answer to these questions, but I am extremely interested in the issue of “access” to both these questions.