Wednesday, June 20, 2018

Luke 20:27-40 (Matt. 22:23-33; Mk. 12:18-27)


Now it’s the Sadducees’ turn to try to play gotcha with Jesus.  Their question was a primary theological difference they had with the Pharisees.  Clearly these groups were very political with the Sadducees being more closely associated with the family of the High Priest while the Pharisees were in the majority on the Jewish council, the Sanhedrin.  But they joined in opposition to Jesus because He was a threat to their powerful and lucrative positions.  But having said that, note that at the end of this story, when Jesus has answered the Sadducees, 

The question is based in the Bible as it poses a hypothetical situation related to the marital laws (see Deut. 25:5-6).  What is at stake is not marriage however but the resurrection from the dead which the Sadducees denied (remember Paul started an argument over this issue in the Sanhedrin in Acts 23:6-10).  Before noting Jesus’ wonderful answer we should remember that a story is not proof of anything.  Narrative is not the primary source of doctrine and the use of the hypothetical demonstrates the emptiness of Sadduceean theology.

Matthew and Mark give us Jesus’ initial answer: the Sadducees erred twice, not knowing the Scriptures and not knowing the power of God.  As to the first err Jesus corrects them in terms of what life is like in eternity.  
  •  ·        Those who attain the next age must be worthy of that, a reference to the necessity of faith in Christ.
  • ·        There is no marriage in the resurrection.  This does not mean that we will not have a relationship with believing spouses in this life or with others.  Marriage is an earthly institution, the first established in creation (Gen. 2).  Thus the extreme situation in the story was irrelevant.
  • ·        Another difference between this life and the next is that in the next there is no death.  They cannot die.  In that sense the saints become like the angels (they do not become angels).
Jesus then dealt with the major issue: is there a resurrection? Jesus used a simple syllogism to explain the Scriptures and the power of God.
o   God is the God of the living (every Jew believe this).
o   God is the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (every Jews knows this).
o   Therefore Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are living.

Again, as with Jesus’ answer to the tax question, there is astonishment.  Perhaps we can see some Pharisaical joy in the Sadducees being put in their place.  As Luke points out, this is the last question coming from the organized opposition (the next question comes from an individual Scribe).  But that is all.  There is no reckoning with the One who speaks the truth and is the Truth.  It’s all about making a point, winning an argument, and embarrassing our Lord.  Sincere questions are good; seeking God is essential.  But we must come to the place where we answer His question: who do you say that I am? (Matt. 16:15)

No comments: