What is often called replacement theology has re-emerged in these days and it is a
challenge to God’s faithfulness. By replacement theology we mean that
doctrine that says that God has determined to give to the Church the blessings
He promised to give to Abraham’s earthly descendents. God clearly promised to Abraham a land (Gen.
12:1,6-7; 13:14-18) and to never permanently remove Israel from that land but
to always bring them back if, because of sin, they were removed (Deut.
32:26-27,43). Replacement theology says that Israel finally crossed a line in the
rejection of their Messiah so that God is now spiritually fulfilling those
promises to the spiritual descendents of Abraham, the Church.
We say “re-emerged” because this idea of God
taking away His promise to Israel (i.e. the descendants of Jacob) first
appeared at the time Israel was taken captive to Babylon. At that time the descendants of Esau (the
Edomites) laid claim to the land given to Israel, determining that God had
withdrawn His promise to Jacob’s descendants (Ezek. 35, esp. v5,10,13,15).
We
have often responded to this idea by reflections on God’s unconditional covenant with Abraham. But from today’s passage we want to reflect
on another unconditional covenant of
God that exists within the
Abrahamic covenant. That is, the
covenant God made with David that is critical to His promise to Abraham. God works through the Davidic King (the
Messiah) to bring about the complete fulfillment of His promise to the
Fathers. In 2 Samuel the covenant is
recorded in 7:12-16 but we would like to draw attention to the entire chapter
to show many things that demonstrate that this covenant was unconditional. David did not earn this covenant; as in the case of Abraham it came to David by
faith.
·
7:1-3: David did not ask for this from God. David never had in mind that God should
establish his house when he told Nathan the prophet that he wanted to build a
permanent home for the Ark. God’s
covenant with David was not an answer to prayer.
·
7:4-7: God did not ask David to build a house
for Him. God is specific about
this. He had never asked anyone. You can see in this the thought that David
was exceptional in that this had come to his mind and heart. But you can also see in this the thought that
God puts David in his place, so to speak.
As Solomon would later affirm, no one can build a house that contains
God (1 Kings 8:27). God speaks of David
as His servant and reminds him that
his rise to power was all God’s doing, which is the next thing to consider.
·
7:8-9: The prelude to God’s covenant with David
is a reminder that God has already been gracious. The rise form shepherd to king over Israel to
victorious conqueror to a name like the
great men who are on the earth is all a work God’s claims for Himself. (We will say more about this in tomorrow’s
post.)
No comments:
Post a Comment