Again, in these chapters, we have a couple of interesting and valuable subjects. Num. 30 is about making vows. The first thing to note is that the basic rule of making vows (promises) is that you must be as good as your word: If a man makes a vow to the LORD or swears an oath to bind himself by some agreement, he shall not break his word; he shall do according to all that proceeds out of his mouth (30:2).
But what about the rest of the chapter? Is a woman’s word not as good as a man’s? Are women put down in that a man (father or
husband) has the final say in her words?
The answer to both these questions is a resounding “no!” The passage actually emphasizes the woman’s need
to stand by her promises. But the
problem is that in the culture, the woman’s ability to fulfill her word was
generally bound up in her father or husband who provided for her and protected
her.
This is not demeaning to women. Rather, it speaks volumes about the value of
family. We may not understand this today
because our society has become confused about the Creator’s plan for families. The only thing that people seem to care about
these days is the right of a woman to do this or that. This passage reminds us of the responsibility
of a man in his home.
Num. 31 probably provides more perplexity for
people today in understanding what was happening. Again, just to set the stage, in our culture,
when one country goes to war with another, the main point is to have no
civilian casualties. We’ve seen Israel
raked over the coals on this, for the deaths of civilians who were, in essence,
planted in the middle of military sites by some terrorist government. I can tell you, the Russians and Chinese and
pretty much anyone else in the world outside the “western” countries do not
think this way.
It was the same with the Romans, Alexander the
Great, the Medes and Persians, the Babylonians, and every nation around
Israel. Not only did they kill
non-military people, they also took slaves.
But there is a much more fundamental issue here. It’s in Num. 31:3: Arm some of yourselves
for war, and let them go against the Midianites to take vengeance for the LORD
on Midian. Israel was taking
vengeance for the LORD! And lest you
think this was just a role for the “Chosen People,” remember that such nations
as the Assyrians, Babylonians and so forth were also God’s servants to take
vengeance, not only on sinful Israel but on other nations.
This is also an issue for Israel when they
crossed over into Canaan. The Canaanites
were to be annihilated because their wickedness had reached God’s limit (Gen.
15:16). In God’s perspective, the battles
were not just about populations. They
were about cultures. Thus, Israel was
permitted to take slaves, and then they were bound to treat those slaves in a
lawful manner according to the Law of Moses.
The threat of death and bondage was God’s deterrent to keep nations from
frivolous wars.
No comments:
Post a Comment