· The fruit of confronting an erring brother, 2:11-31.
It is quite likely Paul’s words to Peter continue
to the end of the chapter; then Paul addresses the foolish Galatians (3:1). It is also likely that this event occurred before
the council at Jerusalem. Gal. 2:11 just
says, Now when Peter had come to Antioch. It is unlikely it was any time after the council
where the issue was settled.
A third observation we should make is that
this event did not sour Peter’s love for Paul.
We know this, of course, from 2 Peter 3:14-16. But you can see it as well in all of 1 Peter,
where Peter’s teachings I believe are remarkably similar to Paul’s. For example, compare 1 Peter 1 to Ephesians
1. What is different is that Peter wrote
to a Jewish Christian audience (1 Pt. 1:1-2) while Paul wrote to a Gentile
Christian audience (Eph. 1:1-2).
Antioch (2:11) became Paul’s “home church” and
was the church that sent him out on his missionary treks. Why did Paul confront Peter publicly (v11, I
withstood him to his face, because he was to be blamed)? The answer is found in Paul’s instructions to
Timothy in 1 Tim. 5:19-20. It was clear
that Peter was wrong because his actions were seen by Paul and everyone
else. Because Peter was an Elder, one
who is supposed to lead God’s people and whom they should follow, he needed
to be rebuked publicly, lest people assume they are to follow him. How often we have seen this over the years when Elders are permitted to do things that are common in their community but
which are contrary to God’s word. It is
one of the primary reasons for dissention in the Body of Christ. Paul did the right thing.
Unlike Peter and even Barnabas, by their
actions, Paul is straightforward about the truth (2:14). This was hypocrisy (2:13). The Greek word is sunhupokrinomi, a
combination of “sun” (to be with
someone else) and “hupokrinomi” (to be a hypocrite). That’s what we mean about this kind of situation
being a cause of dissention in the Church.
Peter took some significant people with him. Paul had to confront him. How we need to be faithful to God and His
Word in these situations.
I
love Paul’s words in v15. Paul is, of
course, a Jew. Peter’s actions were
seeming to say that Gentiles were worse sinners than the Jewish believers. Paul says, in essence, “we Jews are just as
much sinners as the Gentile sinners; we just do it with a different cultural
emphasis.” This kind of bias was present
in the NT Church and it is present today, sad to say. In James the bias was against the poor and in
favor of the rich. Look
around your church today and see what divides people. Is it a love for the truth? Or is it a cultural difference? Or some other division based on human
standards? In the end, these all require
us to be straightforward about the truth.
Ringleaders need to be confronted publicly. The immature brother needs careful shepherding.
No comments:
Post a Comment