Around
the time the rooster would crow to announce the new day the Sanhedrin had
gathered in the house of Caiaphas, the high priest. As has often been noted, there were many
illegal aspects of this trial.
·
The trial was required to be at the meeting
place of the Sanhedrin, not in the house of the high priest.
·
Trials must begin in the daytime, not at night
(it seems that this relatively brief meeting ended as the sun came up when
Jesus was then taken to Pilate).
·
No trial could be held on Sabbath or on feast
days or on the eve of either.
·
A guilty verdict required two or three witnesses
in agreement.
·
Jews had an elaborate system of warning and
cautioning witnesses, unlike here where they were sought out.
·
Guilty verdicts were to be rendered on the
following day.
·
There was to be no prolonged death in capital
punishment and no scourging.
The injustices perpetrated against Jesus are
not the primary issue, although they are significant given the holiness of the
One on trial and the sinfulness of those who rejected their Messiah. Jesus does not cry for justice. Rather He exhibits the meekness of the Lamb predicted in Isa. 53:7: He was oppressed and He was afflicted, yet
He opened not His mouth; He was led as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep
before its shearers is silent, so He opened not His mouth.
It is not that Jesus
is absolutely silent. But we can say
that the truth is powerfully stated both by what Jesus does not say and then
what He does say.
Ø
Jesus DID NOT answer the charges that were
drummed up against Him (destroying the temple) not did He answer when Caiaphas
pressed Him for an answer. They were not
looking for answers or for justice; they only wanted, as had been the case, to
catch Him in a technical mistake of some sort.
Ø
Jesus DID answer when asked, Are you the Christ, the Son of God? This is the fundamental question (as in Matt.
16:15: Who do you say that I am?) This was the reason Jesus had come to earth
and the essence of His public ministry.
This question He answered in the affirmative. This still did not satisfy the verdict of guilty but the council took it as such
anyway.
The result of the
guilty verdict was that Jesus was beaten and ridiculed: beaten with the fist
and the open hand and mocked as Prophet (Mark 14:65), King (Mark 15:16-20) and Messiah
(Mark 15:29-32). Jesus is unequivocal in
His submission to His Father’s will, the matter that was settled in
Gethsemane. This is our Lord, who when He was reviled, did not revile in
return; when He suffered, He did not threaten, but committed Himself to Him who
judges righteously (1 Pt. 2:23). Likewise,
let those who suffer according to the
will of God commit their souls to Him in doing good, as to a faithful Creator
(1 Pt. 4:19).
No comments:
Post a Comment