One of the primary objections to the idea of sacrifices at a temple in Messiah’s kingdom
is that these sacrifices are said to make atonement. How can there be sacrifices for atonement in
light of the once-for-all sacrifice of Christ.
As Hebrews 10:18 says, Now where
there is remission of these (sins and lawless deeds, 10:17), there is no longer an offering for sin. So of course, there is never a need to supplement
the work of the cross of Jesus Christ.
Never! If the issue is the remission of sin then sacrifices in the
Kingdom can serve no purpose.
But let us clarify the role of the sacrifices.
·
First, the law of Moses did not save. The only way
it could was if you kept it entirely (in Gal. 3:12 and Rom. 10:5 Paul quotes
Lev. 18:5 to verify this point). The
point of Deut. 30:12-14 is just this.
Israelites could not do the impossible (keep the law) but the impossible
was not required. They would be saved as
was Abraham (Gen. 15:6) and as was David (Psa. 32:1-2).
·
What this means then is that the sacrifices
themselves did not save. The faith of the one bringing the sacrifice
would save him. That is why God could
tell the people from time to time He was tired of their sacrifices and didn’t
want them to bring them (Mal. 1:6-14; Isaiah 1:10-17). From the beginning God wanted their hearts;
the Law provided the means by which they expressed their faith or else the Law
revealed the sinfulness of their hearts.
·
Faith in Christ, either as hope looking forward
or as the object of faith looking back, has always been the means of
salvation. It will be no different in
the Messianic Kingdom. People will still
need a Savior and will be called to trust Christ alone. But if the sacrifices are a memorial, an expression of what has
happened already at the cross, it is possible to say that they can be an
expression of faith in THE sacrifice of Christ. It is the same today. When Peter told the people to repent and … be baptized … for the remission
of sins (Acts 2:38) he was not calling on them to add something to the work
of Christ. Baptism was the means by
which their faith was expressed.
·
Further, a careful reading of Ezekiel (e.g.
43:20,26; 45:15,17,20) will reveal that the atonement
spoken of is not the atonement of personal
salvation. It refers to the sanctifying
of the altar and of the temple itself. A
careful reading of the Torah will reveal this as well, that often atonement was a matter of the dedication
or consecration of the items in the temple or of those who served.
The seemingly clear statements in the Old
Testament about worship in the Kingdom call on us to acknowledge that sacrifices
are involved. To deny this is to render
words of Scripture meaningless and to open the door to the confusion of
uncalled for allegory and indefensible interpretations. Hopefully these studies will help think
through this issue. The Scriptures
cannot be broken.
No comments:
Post a Comment