Thursday, November 23, 2023

2 Timothy 3:10-16, The Inerrancy of Scripture (3)

This might not be as detailed as you might like, but there are books and web pages that exist on this subject.  Are their errors in the Bible?  It would seem there are things at odds, perhaps differing numbers from lists that are supposed to be the same.  And sometimes things more important than that.  So what about these?  First, here are some general answers.

·       Many difficulties already have highly probable solutions.

·       For others, the evidence is not in.

·       Many are based on presuppositions of the critics (those who deny the possibility of predicted prophecy, or who deny the supernatural).

·       Many alleged errors offer great division on the part of the critics.

The statement from the church doctrinal statement we quoted in an earlier post indicates inerrancy applies to the original autographs.  That might make it doubtful that we have a very good copy of the Bible it the only reliable one is the original.  (We will discuss the doctrine of “preservation” later which deals with this.)  But we can say that the confirming data tells us that what we have is very reliable.  I am still in awe of God’s preservation after the Dead Sea Scrolls took us back several hundred years earlier than our oldest manuscripts, and they were identical.  It is ultimately a faith matter, but the evidence points to very reliable manuscripts.

Here are a few illustrations of “supposed errors” and their answer.

1)    Supposed error: Matt.22:42 and Luke 20:41 record differently the same question asked by Christ.  He must have said one or the other or neither.

a)    Answer: A harmony of the passages shows that each was recording part of the conversation. "Now while the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them a question, saying, 'What do you think of the Christ? Whose son is he?'  They said to him, 'The son of David'" (Mt.22:41) "But he said to them, 'How can they say that the Christ is David's son?'" (Lk.20:41)

2)    Supposed error: In 2 Chron. 4:2 the "molten sea" is said to have a 10 cubit diameter and 30 cubit circumference.  This cannot be, since it is said to be round.

a)    Answer: Facts...Cubit = 18"; handbreadth = 4"...Sea is said to be, thus, 180" across, and 4" thick (v5). If the 8" (2 thicknesses) is taken from the 180" diameter it leaves 172" which when multiplied by pi (3.14) it equals 540.08 inches which is 30 cubits.  The diameter was measured to the outer rim, the circumference on the inner rim.

3)    Supposed error: Mark 2:26 says David ate the bread "when Abiathar was high priest" but 1Sam.21:1ff says the HP was Ahimelech, the son of Abiathar.

a)    Answer: Another reading in Mark is quite likely, as in NIV, "In the days of Abiathar the High Priest." I.e. it is not necessarily that he served as HP at the time but, like those in Jesus time (Annas and his son Caiaphas), was a principle party serving under or alongside his father.

4)    Supposed error: Contradiction in numbers, I Cor 10 says 23,000 fell but Num.25:9 says 24,000.  A manuscript error is not likely.

a)    Answer: Possible transmission error since Hebrew numbers were easy to confuse in the way they were written.  Further, the 2 numbers could represent approximations of the actual number which might have been in-between.  Further, Paul's number may exclude some put to death by the leaders (Num.25:5) and not specifically killed in the plague.

The word of the omniscient and all-wise God must display perfect knowledge and wisdom.  In the Bible we have such a word.  Today is Thanksgiving Day in the USA.  Here is something for which we can give thanks: the inspired, inerrant, authoritative word of God!

No comments: