Let’s think today about “teamwork” in the NT. “Teamwork” is probably not the term any theologian would select to describe the relationship of God the Father and God the Son. But it actually illustrates “teamwork” at it’s best, with the Son submitting Himself to the will of His Father at all times. 1 Cor. 11:3 on the various “headship” relationships allows us to study the Trinity for truth about “teamwork.”
Let me just briefly note a few other of these
relationships. There was Joseph of Arimathea
and Nicodemus (John 19:38-42). Joseph
had the tomb and brought the linens; Nicodemus brought the spices. These two members of the Sanhedrin who
believed Jesus to be the Christ cooperated as a team.
Peter and John, in Acts 3-4, is a great
study. Both were together; both
arrested; both were threatened by the leaders.
But Peter is the talker and John is not recorded to have said anything. Perhaps he was the “prayer.” For sure, he encouraged Peter.
Paul and Silas were partners (Acts
16-18). We don’t get much of a picture
of Silas’s role. Again, in Philippi,
both were together, both arrested, both singing in jail, both miraculously
released, and both stood up to the city fathers. But Paul was the talker when they were together.
The team we get the best look at is Paul and
Barnabas. There is no question that
Barnabas is the primary driving force in the creation of this team (humanly speaking,
not to discount the Head of the Church who places people where He desires them
to be, or the Holy Spirit whose gifts and fruit make fruitful relationships
possible). We meet Barnabas first in
Acts 4:36-37 as the generous brother re-named by the Apostles because of his
gift of encouragement. Next we see him in
9:26-30 taking Saul before the Jerusalem Church. The last time we see him, at the time of the
splitting up of the team, he takes his nephew John Mark, the one who had left
the team earlier, and heads for Cyprus for ministry (15:39). His continued encouragement of Mark resulted in the young man’s spiritual growth so that Paul later found him desirable in
ministry (2 Tim. 4:11).
Consider how this team changed over the course
of time. First, Barnabas was the leading
figure; but on the first missionary journey Paul became prominent (from “Barnabas
and Saul" (13:7,) to “Paul and his party" (13:13.) Paul had become the lead speaker (14:12). Not many “teams” can stand this kind of
transition; but it worked for these two.
Undoubtedly Barnabas’ gift was a lot of the reason. What you see, in all the relationships we
have mentioned, one member of the two is more prominent, either as the One making
the decisions (God the Father) or the one who is more out in front than the other. The humility of John (with Peter) and
Barnabas (with Paul) is essential in teamwork.
It is interesting that both these men went on to take the lead in
ministry in other settings.
To my way of thinking, Barnabas’ “encouragement”
was at the heart of the splitting up of the team. He refused to just drop Mark. Even as he had been willing to come alongside
Saul at the beginning, so he stood with Mark.
I also have no doubt that Paul’s gift and calling was at the core of the
division. His desire to get the gospel
to the nations made him reluctant to have team members whose loyalty or stick-to-itiveness
might be iffy. His task was too
critical. In the end, we never hear
again from Barnabas (not a bad thing, just a fact) but, as we noted, we do hear
of Mark. And it is Paul, from prison,
who has a positive word to say concerning the one he believed should not be
part of the team on the second journey.
Concerning the team, after the sharp
contention (15:39) here is something we can say: neither Paul nor Barnabas quit
the ministry over the matter. That is
something we often cannot say when there are divisions in ministry. It means that pride was not at the basis of
the argument. Teamwork in ministry is
essential and the best way to work. Contrary
to what you might think: the keys to this teamwork are not compromise and
taking turns. The keys are always Spirit-led
headship and Spirit-led submission.
No comments:
Post a Comment