Matthew 2 contains details of Jesus’ early life
that Luke was not led by the Spirit to include.
There is the story of the wise men and the massacre of infants in Bethlehem. In addition, Luke simply indicates the family
settled in Nazareth; but Matthew tells of the
escape to Egypt before
returning to Nazareth. Matthew also acknowledges fulfillment of
three prophecies. Let us consider each.
The flight to Egypt is said to fulfill Hosea 11:1
which says, “When Israel was a child, I loved him. And out of Egypt I called My son.” If Hosea refers to the Nation (Israel) how can
it be applied to the Messiah? The answer is found in the connection between
Israel
and Messiah seen often in the Old
Testament. Messiah
is the obedient Servant in Isaiah that Israel had not been. Israel was seen as God’s son, but Israel was
not the faithful son, while the Messiah
did fill that role. Thus there is seen
in Matthew’s reference to the Messiah’s
identification with the Nation. As Israel went to Egypt
for protection in the time of the famine, so the Messiah
went to Egypt
for protection for a short period.
The murder
of the innocents is a fulfillment of Jer. 31:15. The reference to Rachel in Jeremiah seems to
refer to Joseph and Benjamin, Rachel’s two sons who were part of the population
of both the northern and southern kingdoms of Israel after Solomon’s time. In other words it acknowledged the suffering
of all God’s people in Jeremiah’s time.
But the thought that it looked to a future suffering is not unusual. The connection of Rachel to Bethlehem (remember, she died there; Gen.
35:16-20) makes what happened in Matthew 2 very apropos. The birth of the Messiah
was not the end of Israel’s
suffering.
In Matt. 2:23 the return to Nazareth is said to fulfill words spoken by
the prophets, “He shall be called a Nazarene.”
This is somewhat enigmatic as there is not such a phrase in the Old
Testament. Note first, it is not the
same as Nazirite (Num. 6). Second, Messiah’s
ministry was connected to Galilee (Isa.
9:1). Galilean and Nazarene are
synonymous as places denigrated by the Jews (Jn. 1:46; Ac. 2:7). And both are used of Christ (Matt.
26:69,71). Thus this could refer to the
way the Messiah would be shamefully
treated. Another explanation comes from
the meaning of the name “Nazarene”. It
may come from the Hebrew word for “branch” (neser). In that case Matthew would be referring to
passages such as Isa. 11:1 and many others that call Messiah
“the Branch.”
Acknowledging the difficulty in understanding
certain passages does no damage to the truth of our Lord Jesus Christ. There are always Scriptures that need further
study. God’s word through Matthew is
right on, however, in that Jesus of Nazareth is the fulfillment of God’s
purpose and plan that was revealed through the prophets. Over 65 times Matthew refers to Old Testament
passages in telling the story of Christ.
Let us rejoice that God is faithfully doing all He promised, and will
continue until all bow the knee to His Son (Phil. 2:9-11).