Monday, November 1, 2021

Deuteronomy 4:25-40, One God, Ever, Always

Today’s passage is part of a strong statement against idolatry in Deuteronomy.  Idolatry is the worship of any “god” but the true God, YAHWEH, the God who made the heavens and earth (Gen. 2:4).  YAHWEH is God of Israel.  But even before Israel’s nationhood YAHWEH was God, and for that reason the name “YAHWEH” is attributed to God throughout the earliest Biblical accounts in Genesis.  YAHWEH was both the God of Israel and the God of the entire world and universe!

Nevertheless, supposedly intelligent people deny this.  I want to share with you a paragraph from a 1918 Guide to Southern Palestine published by “The News of Palestine.”  This was back in the day when “travel guides” were really travel guides.  It wasn’t a book of hotels and restaurants.  Rather it was a book that really gave you a background on where it was you wanted to tour.  So in the early part of this book there is a history of Southern Palestine, in 1918 very shortly after the ANZAC forces under Gen. Allenby had delivered Beersheba from the control of the Ottomans.  Here is just one paragraph, describing from the Old Testament, the religion of Israel.

Meanwhile, the worship of Yahweh was essentially advanced by the writings of Amos, Hosea, Micah, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and other prophets. The advance consisted mainly in loftier ideas of the moral and spiritual nature of the Deity, leading to the conception of Yahweh as the God, not merely of Israel, but of the whole world.  This was a basis on which the religion of Israel could be preserved and developed amid the coming troubles.  One of the most important events in the history of the religion of Israel is the centralization of the worship of Yahweh in Jerusalem in the days of JOSIAH (620 BC), a movement consequent on the introduction of the new book of the law, Deuteronomy.

This isn’t a Bible commentary or theological book; it’s a guide book for travelers to the Middle East.  So, where did this person get these ideas, that “centralization of the worship of Yahweh in Jerusalem” was not required until the time of Josiah? Is the author maybe some Islamist or Jew-hater, an Ottoman who is upset about the turn of events?  I honestly don’t know much about the author, but honestly, that has nothing to do with this.  The fact is, this was the common belief of the day. 

This rejection of an early date for Deuteronomy was put forward by liberal, often German, theologians of the day.  They denied the inerrancy of Scripture. They denied inerrancy because they were anti-supernaturalists.  They denied the miraculous, which included words prophesied and then fulfilled, sometimes hundreds of years later.  Thus, they had to put Deuteronomy into the time of Josiah because Deut. 28 and 32 were being fulfilled before their very eyes, and the prophets like Amos, Hosea, et. al. were referring to Deuteronomy as they called the people to repentance. 

In my view, this was all settled in the Modernist/Fundamentalist controversy of the early 1900s.  The conclusion was that Scripture could be trusted.  But here is the truly sad thing.  Today, this late-date for Deuteronomy “stuff” has made a come-back.  Even in my own state of Montana there are “evangelicals” who hold to this idea.  It is an attack on the veracity of Scripture.

So, let me restate the simple facts from Dt. 1:1-2: first, Deuteronomy is the words of Moses; second, Moses spoke these words in the plains of Moab when Israel was about to cross over into Canaan; and third, the people of Israel then, and the people of Israel after that time, were accountable to God for obedience to what was said by Moses.  If you deny that, you deny the Scriptures that have been preserved by God and passed down to us today.  This is a truly important issue.  It is a part of the theological attack on God’s future plan for Israel.  Deuteronomy 32 strongly promises and predicts the salvation of the nation of Israel.  Denial of that promise is a major part of the deception of the latter days.  We need to stand strong on this matter!

No comments: