Today we want to dwell on 1 Timothy 4. “The Spirit expressly says that in latter times some will depart from the faith”: obviously, that is “special revelation.” What about vs.3b-5: “every creature of God is good, and nothing is to be refused if it is received with thanksgiving.” Is that something that only “those who believe and know the truth” can know or can all people know this?
Clearly, “those who
believe and know the truth” should know this. The Bible (SR) helps us overcome deficiencies
in our understanding caused by sin. Also,
we will concede (because it is not germane to our study) that SR is necessary
to know that food received with thanksgiving “is sanctified by the word of God
and prayer.”
But what about all
men? What can and should they know? The answer takes us back to Gen. 4 when Cain
and Abel brought their thanksgiving offerings to God. We have no record that God had told them to
do this. The only SR is what God said to
Cain about what he needed to do. God did
not remind Cain of some command that had been given. I would suggest that Cain and Abel, and Adam
and Eve for that matter, could know, by virtue of GR (creation and conscience),
that:
·
Every creature of God is good. This can be assumed from the fact they knew
God to be a good Creator. And if
everything from God is good (and it is), then nothing should be refused.
·
We are obligated to worship the Creator by
giving thanks for His good provision.
Again, we don’t need the Bible to tell us that if God has given us good
things (and He has), then we must give thanks to Him.
However, what interests
me is v6-10. The two paragraphs (v1-5
and 6-10) are connected. Timothy is
supposed to teach v1-5 according to v6-10.
And, he is supposed to “reject profane and old wives fables” (v7). What are these “fables?” I would suggest they are corrupt forms of “general
revelation.” For one thing, they are “profane,”
meaning they are common, accessible. It’s
what all people, or at least a lot of people, think. “Old wives” fables are generally what some
people call “common sense” that come out of the home. In this context, it’s an approach to eating
that mothers have devised. They are like
“home remedies.” These could be true or
false but they are an approach to things that happen that have come from “experience.” They don’t necessarily fit “good science.” But someone said something worked for them
and so everyone should do it.
Why did Paul point
out these “fables?” Because everyone deals
with the truth of a good Creator and our thankful response to Him. These “fables” are the attempts to do this,
to explain how we live in this world. They
may or may not be in a religious context.
After all, men generally “suppress” the truth of God (Rom. 1:18). For some, it involved rules about what to eat
and what not to eat. For others, it
involved bodily exercise. This will help
prolong life, and after all, this is all we get. Both these things are corruptions of GR and
Paul, by SR, is correcting them.
We cannot know the plan of salvation, nor the
details of “heaven and hell,” on the basis of GR alone. However, as Ecclesiastes shows (Eccl.
3:16-22), we can, on the basis of “creation and conscience,” conclude that we
will have to give an account to the One who created us, and that as it now
stands, we are liable for judgment (without excuse)!
No comments:
Post a Comment