First, let us consider some questions raised concerning the accuracy of this story.
·
For centuries the skeptics denied the existence
of any king names Belshazzar, and especially that he was the last king of Babylon. 250 years after the fall of Babylon the
historian Broesus had no record of Belshazzar.
According to history Nabonidus was the last king of Babylon. But with the discovery of the ‘Nabonidus
Chronicles” in 1882 and other tablets unearthed in 1924, it was found that
Belshazzar, in fact, was a co-ruler with Nabonidus, his father. While Nabonidus was engaged in battles in the
western part of the empire, Belshazzar ruled from Babylon up until the very
night that the Medes and Persians conquered.
·
In 5:18 Daniel refers to Nebuchadnezzar as
Belshazzar’s father. History indicates
Nabonidus was his literal father. It is
proper to refer to Nebuchadnezzar as his “father” in the same sense Abraham was
the father of any Israelite. Further, it
is likely that Nabonidus married a descendent of Nebuchadnezzar to gain status
in the royal family, thus making Belshazzar a physical relative of
Nebuchadnezzar.
·
Daniel records that on “that very night” the
Medes captured Babylon. This is
confirmed in history. Babylon was
considered impregnable, which may account for the revelry that night. The Medes discovered that, with considerable
effort, they could block the water entering the city in one of the canals, thus
allowing their army to enter in the middle of the night and to take it without
a serious battle.
Why was the proud
Belshazzar weighed in the balances and found wanting, while the proud
Nebuchadnezzar was restored to power after the seven years of insanity? Consider two signs of pride with Belshazzar.
·
He treated God’s justice with contempt. Cyrus, King of Persia, was outside the city
as this festival went on. History tells
us Cyrus knew of the feast. Unlike the
king of Nineveh, in the days of Jonah, who called for a fast when confronted
with sin, Belshazzar called for a feast when judgment was imminent.
·
He treated God’s holiness with contempt. He took lightly the temple vessels. These vessels were essential to temple worship. The originals, from the time of David and
Solomon, were either removed by the Egyptians (1 Ki. 14) or cut in pieces by King
Ahaz (2 Chr. 27:24). Under King Hezekiah
they were repaired and replaced in the temple, only to be taken to Babylon by
Nebuchadnezzar. Nebuchadnezzar had at
least respected God as Most High among many gods; but Belshazzar’s actions here
showed that he disrespected God as no god at all.
God’s judgment is always righteous, in reading
the hearts and deeds of men. God gives
grace to the humble, and Nebuchadnezzar humbled himself. Belshazzar did not (v22)! And God resists the proud. These two stories about pride (Dan. 4-5) are
here for our edification. Let us hear
and fear the Lord!
No comments:
Post a Comment